What does an “eye for an eye” strategy achieve other than making “the whole world blind,” as Gandhi observed?
A sign hung in a Greenfield, Massachusetts, storefront window: “Negotiate for Peace in Ukraine” – the most direct of the many “Peace,” “and singular “Make Tea Not War;” “Food For All, Not War; “Books Not War;” “Brew Beer Not War;” “Solar Not War;” “Shoes Not War;” “Art Not War” signs in our Greenfield Shops for Peace project. “Negotiate for Peace in Ukraine” – a concrete application of the other signs – was too charged and controversial for some customers, so it no longer is there.While deeply disappointed, I was not surprised. When I first held the same sign in our Saturday morning peace vigil on the Greenfield Common, a number of people passing by objected to ending the war until Russia could be defeated, specifically Putin. But, what does an “eye for an eye” strategy achieve other than making “the whole world blind,” as Gandhi observed. The ultimate weakness of violence, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. wisely noted, is that “…you may murder the hater, but you do not murder hate. In fact, violence merely increases hate…Darkness cannot drive out darkness: only light can do that.“
Nearly half of US citizens want their government to keep supplying weapons and military training to Ukraine to sustain the war, while the majority of the world’s people want negotiations to end the war. The global call for ending the conflict includes the rising powers of the Global South, among them China; a high-level mission of African countries; a “peace club” of countries being created by Brazil; Pope Francis and the Vatican; Denmark, offering to host a peace summit; the 1,400-city US Conference of Mayors and hundreds of US organizations and faith-based leaders.
Why are so many countries, organizations and people across the world urging an end to this seemingly regional war, sustained by US and NATO weapons?
Why are so many countries, organizations and people across the world urging an end to this seemingly regional war, sustained by US and NATO weapons? In a nutshell, this war kills and gravely harms not only the combatants fighting but also millions of others. The global cost is catastrophic.
- Nearly 100,000 Ukrainians and Russians have died in this war. “But wars often kill far more people indirectly than in direct combat, particularly young children,” according to the Cost of War Project at Brown University.
- An estimated 250,000 extremely poor people of the Global South have died of starvation, and world hunger has doubled afflicting nearly 350 million people because of war-related grain, fertilizer and seed oil shortages from Ukraine and Russia and the resulting food price inflation.
- Inflation of energy costs, due to US sanctions on Russia and consequent new drilling for gas and oil by the US, have also worsened extreme poverty in the Global South, affecting millions of people.
- International aid desperately needed by developing countries to recover from climate emergencies, conflict and food crises was severely cut and diverted to humanitarian crises in Ukraine. For the rest of the world, 45% of critical life and death assistance was not met.
- Nature is always the silent casualty of war. This war is no exception, causing extreme pollution in Ukraine: contaminated rivers, toxic smoke and soil from Russian-bombed industrial centers; charred forest; land mines and poisoned agricultural fields; nature reserves reduced to craters; and contaminated scrap metal from destroyed tanks and military equipment. Millions of tons of climate warming CO2 have been and will be released from war-related oil, gas and jet fuel use; from weapons manufacture and the anticipated rebuilding of Ukraine. The most dangerous of all environmental and health risks is the vulnerable Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant, which has had fires, damage to power lines, water shortage and threats to its cooling systems. Most recently the destruction of the nearby Kakhovka dam endangered tens of thousands of people, animals and other nature downstream.
- Military spending is surging in the US, NATO and Russia and expected to follow throughout Asia – stealing vital resources, as President Eisenhower presciently warned, from those who need it most. “Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed.“
- According to University of Massachusetts economist Robert Pollin, the world cannot afford a Global Green New Deal – costing some “$4.5 trillion annually” – to prevent “devastating climate chaos” unless “global military spending is curbed at the same time.” All the work of the climate movement will be futile without ending this war via a realizable peace plan and reducing military spending significantly in the U.S. and worldwide for good.
“Memorial Day” in Live Free (or die), Human Error Publishing
Eric Wasileski, minister, poet and Veteran for Peace
Eric Wasileski. Photo: Ellen Davidson
Violence destroys
It destroys:
lives
homes
infrastructure
means of production
and nature…
Honor the [war]dead by ending war.
Honor the living by making peace.
Join the thousands of citizens urging their Senators and Representative to support a ceasefire and peace negotiations: call the U.S. Capitol Hill switchboard at (202) 224-3121.
Eric Wasileski speaking on militarism and climate change at an Armistice Day commemoration in Greenfield, Massachusetts, in 2018.
H. Patricia Hynes is a retired professor of Environmental Health from Boston University School of Public Health and current chair of the board of the Traprock Center for Peace and Justice. She has written and edited seven books, among them The Recurring Silent Spring. She writes and speaks on issues of war and militarism with an emphasis on women, the environment, and public health. Her new book, Hope, But Demand Justice, is available from Haley’s Publishing.
